Anyway, as always, watch the games here. Doing work is for suckers.


Best Case: Ty Lawson's troublesome toe stops throbbing. Opponents start sobbing. Tar Heels bend their knees and play defense for 40 minutes. Then they do it again. And again. And again. That's four times against a weak region, resulting in a Final Four berth. Then they do it again. And again. That's six times, and that equals a national championship. Tyler Hansbrough ties title game against Memphis by scoring while being knocked down an NCAA-record 2,360th time, then wins it on a free throw with no time left. Ol' Roy is classy in victory again, chasing down John Calipari to console him as he did Bruce Weber in 2005. Duke loses to Texas.
Worst Case: Lawson's troublesome toe never fully recovers, and neither do the Heels. They're beaten in the Sweet 16 by Gonzaga, the only team in the region with the talent to trade open shots with Carolina and win. Hansbrough gets no calls after jumping into Gonzaga players an NCAA-record 26 times in a single game. Ol' Roy overuses his bench, gets uptight, loses and gets misty-eyed postgame. Says he's gonna frickin' miss these guys, but does not ramble incoherently the way he did after Kansas loss last year. Because he really won't miss their frickin' lax defense. Duke wins it all.
You get the feeling that next six games will define how history judges this team. This generation of Carolina players is as talented as any we’ve seen, but they’re playing through a season of injury and surprising parity. Of course, any team that manages to win a National Championship is judged as better, or at least better remembered. But does losing in the Final Four diminish a team’s talent? Of course not, but college basketball is not the NBA; there often is no “next season.” You have a defined lifetime in college basketball, not to be exceeded, and often to be shortened, which really changes the way the game is played. It necessitates a sense of urgency that the NBA lacks. That being said, it stands to reason that Championships are the central criteria of enduring teams; but if National Championships are the bottom line definer of a team, then this team has yet to fulfill expectations.
that say about how we judge success? We’ve witnessed the ascension of one of the most dominant college basketball players of all time; we’ve seen maybe the prettiest jump shot one can ever hope to see; we have a point guard that can pick apart defenses like no one we’ve seen since Phil Ford (sorry, Ray Ray). So how will we judge this team? Where do we place it in the canon of Carolina legends?
for a jumper. Or how about the look on Ty’s face when he decides he’s going to the lane, and you aren’t going to stop him? Come on. We all know we’ve witnessed something greater than we expected after the 2005 season… and yes, relish it; this team is the stuff of legends. Semifinals
Duke over North Carolina (52 percent odds) -- another toss-up that has the loser outscoring the winner, 73.4-72.7; Memphis over Louisville (six-tenths of a point, 52 percent odds).
Curiosity: Pitt would project to beat the Tar Heels by two points, at 57.3 percent odds.

